Modern Physics · Nuclear physics, Elastic collisions, Ideal gas
Neutron moderation in a thermal reactor — speeds, temperatures, number of collisions to thermalise, and gas buildup in spent fuel rods.
Solution and grading scheme by Topi Lind, Melvin Storbacka, Oleg Kosik, Aleksandr Sorokin and Ludmila Belogrudova.
Part i (1 point)
If the speed of the particle is much less than the speed of light, we can use the non-relativistic approach. For non-relativistic particles we know v=2Ek/m. Substituting values gives us vf=2.2×103ms−1. This is much less than the speed of light and thus justified. Another way to justify the applicability of the non-relativistic approach would be to say that kinetic energy is significantly less than the rest energy (Ef≪mnc2).
Typo in problem description.Ef=0.025eV is the mode of the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution which gives E=kBT. The average gives E=23kBT.
Using the mode of the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, E=kBT, and converting from eV to J:
Tf=1.38×10−230.025×1.602×10−19=290K.
With E=23kBT we find Tf≈193K.
Part ii (1 point)
The non-relativistic approach is justified as in the previous task. The same approach gives us v0=2.0×107ms−1.
Grading for parts i and ii (preliminary)
Expresses vf=2Ef/m and/or v0=2E0/m: 0.3 pts
Calculates vf=2.2×103ms−1 and/or v0=2.0×107ms−1 for two correct numerical values: 0.5 pts; if only one value is correct: 0.3 pts
Uses Ef=23kBT: 0.3 pts
Using this formula calculates T=193K: 0.3 pts
Justifies the validity of the classical approach in both cases: 0.3 + 0.3 pts
Remark. Using Ef=kBT without justification and finding T=290K gives 0 pts for the formula and 0.3 pts for the numerical calculation.
Part iii (2.5 points)
In a collision between particle 1 (m1, v1,i and v1,f) and particle 2 (m2, v2,i and v2,f) momentum is conserved,
m1(v1,f−v1,i)=m2(v2,i−v2,f),
and since the collisions are elastic, kinetic energy is also conserved:
m1(v1,f2−v1,i2)=m2(v2,i2−v2,f2).
Dividing the latter by the former leads to
v1,i+v1,f=v2,i+v2,f.
Substituting this into the conservation of momentum gives for particle 1:
v1,f=m1+m2m1−m2v1,i+m1+m22m2v2,i,
and similarly for particle 2:
v2,f=m1+m22m1v1,i+m1+m2m1−m2v2,i.
We see that with m1=m2 there is a maximum transfer of momentum. Assuming that particle 1 is the neutron and particle 2 is the target, and that the target is at rest for all intents and purposes, the mass of the moderator atoms should be the same as the neutron’s.
In a single collision with a stationary atom of the moderator, the speed of the neutron decreases by the factor m1+m2m1−m2, so the speed of the neutron after N head-on collisions with stationary atoms of moderator will be
T≪Tf, so moderator atoms are essentially at rest: 0.3 pts
Justifies that maximum momentum transfer is when mn=M: 0.4 pts
Applies energy and momentum conservation: 0.3 + 0.3 pts
Expresses u=vm1+m2m1−m2: 0.4 pts
Expresses vf=v0(m1+m2m1−m2)N: 0.5 pts
Calculates N=614: 0.3 pts
Part iv (1.5 points)
We can model the gas inside the rod as an ideal gas. Simply due to swelling, the pressure inside the rod would increase from 2.5 MPa to 5 MPa as we know from Boyle’s law P1V1=P2V2⇒P2=P1V1/V2. Thus, the release of xenon must contribute 1.5 MPa’s worth of pressure due to Dalton’s law ptot=pHe+pXe. From the ideal gas law we find the amount of xenon moles as
nXe=RT0pXeV=5.5×10−3mol,
where pXe=1.5MPa, V2=9cm3 and T=293K. In a similar manner we find that the amount of helium in the beginning was
nHe=RT0pHeV0=1.8×10−2mol,
where PHe=2.5MPa, V0=18cm3 and T0=293K. The ratio of the two is