Problem Set
NBPhO 2026
1. Moving Lens 6 pts
Reconstruct the unseen circular path of a moving thin lens, and the direction of its plane, from the closed image curves it traces of two fixed object points.
Overview
A thin converging lens of fixed orientation moves so that its centre traces a circle in the plane of the figure. The optical axis lies in this plane, and the focal length is fixed. Two object points and are imaged to closed curves and .
We will need only two facts about thin-lens imaging:
-
The chief ray is undeviated. A ray from any object point through the lens centre continues in a straight line. Hence , , are collinear, with between and whenever the image is real (the case here).
-
Lens equation along the chord . Let be the angle between the line and the optical axis . The axial object and image distances are
Substituting these into gives the form we will use throughout part (ii):
There are five unknowns hidden in the figure: the centre and radius of the lens-centre circle (3 numbers), the direction of the optical axis (1 number), and the focal length (1 number). The problem only asks for the first four; the fifth () drops out as a free by-product, as we will see.
The solution proceeds in two essentially independent steps:
- Part (i) uses only fact 1 — the curves and live in the angular wedges subtended by the lens circle at and .
- Part (ii) uses fact 2 — a harmonic-mean construction collapses the unknown angle and produces a straight line parallel to the lens plane.
Part (i) — The lens-centre circle
Key observation: tangent rays are shared
Because lies on segment , the direction from to is exactly the direction from to . As runs around its circle once, the line of sight pivots through the angular wedge bounded by the two tangent lines from to the lens circle, sweeping it twice (once on the way out, once on the way back). The image curve is contained in this same wedge, and reaches its boundary at the moment coincides with one of the tangent points.
The conclusion:
The two tangent lines from to the image curve are exactly the two tangent lines from to the lens-centre circle.
The same holds for and curve . So the figure already contains four lines tangent to the lens circle — two from , two from — even though the lens circle itself is not drawn.
Construction
ℓP+ ℓQ+
P •──────────●─────────●──────●Q
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
bP ─────●───── bQ
/O\
/ \
/ \
/ \
── ℓP− ──── ● ────────●─── ℓQ− ──
lens
circle
- Draw the four tangent rays. From , sweep a straightedge until it just touches curve from each side; mark the two extreme positions and . Repeat from on curve to obtain and .
- Bisect the angle at between and . Call the bisector .
- Bisect the angle at between and . Call the bisector .
- The centre is .
- The radius is the perpendicular distance from to any one of the four tangent rays.
Why this works
For any point outside a circle, the two tangent lines drawn from are reflections of each other across the line (where is the centre). So the angle bisector at between them passes through . We have two such external points, and , hence two bisectors that intersect at . The radius is then the common perpendicular distance from to all four tangent lines — which provides a four-fold consistency check (all four perpendicular distances must agree).
Educational remark — tangent line, but not tangent point
The tangent line touches the lens circle at some point , where the lens centre passes at one specific instant. The same line touches the curve at the image of , which is the point . Because for real images, the tangent point on the curve is further from than the tangent point on the lens circle, but the two tangent points lie on the same straight tangent line. This is enough for the construction — only the line, not the contact points, matters.
Self-intersection of
The figure shows that curve has a self-intersection (it is shaped like a figure-eight), while is a simple loop. The construction cares only about the outermost tangent rays from — the rays bounding the angular extent of the curve as seen from . Internal tangent lines that touch interior loops of a self-intersecting curve are not tangent to the lens circle. (A self-intersection of at angle from corresponds to two distinct lens positions on the chord through at angle producing the same image — a coincidence in that does not affect the angular envelope.)
Part (ii) — The lens-plane direction
Key observation: a harmonic-mean point on each chord
For any chord at angle to the optical axis, rearrange the lens equation derived in the overview:
The quantity on the left is computable directly from the figure once we know (which we do, from part (i)). It is one half of the harmonic mean of the two segment lengths.
Now mark, on segment , the auxiliary point
Two properties of :
- by construction.
- The component of along the optical axis is
The right-hand side is independent of where sits on its circle. So no matter which lens position we pick, the corresponding has the same axial coordinate relative to . In other words:
Every lies on a single straight line — the line perpendicular to at axial distance from .
That line is parallel to the lens plane, since both are perpendicular to . Determining its direction is therefore equivalent to answering part (ii).
Construction
We assume part (i) has produced the lens circle. We do not need to know or — they emerge.
- Choose three (or more) well-separated points on the curve .
- For each , draw the line . It meets the lens circle in two points; call either one . (See the both branches remark below — it does not matter which.)
- Construct the length
using the harmonic-mean ruler-and-compass construction below, and mark on segment at this distance from . 4. The points are collinear. The line through them is parallel to the lens plane.
The same recipe starting from produces a parallel line (also perpendicular to , but at axial distance from rather than from ). Doing both halves and confirming they come out parallel is a strong consistency check on the entire construction.
Harmonic-mean construction (similar triangles)
Given collinear with between, construct on segment with :
A •
|\
| \
| \
| \
B • \
|\ \
| \ \
| \ \
P • M ── L ───── P'
- Through , draw any auxiliary line not collinear with .
- On it, mark with .
- On it, mark with , between and .
- Draw segment .
- Through , draw the line parallel to . It meets segment at .
By similar triangles :
so as required.
Why both branches give the same
A line through in a direction inside the wedge crosses the lens circle in two points and on the same chord — hence at the same angle from . The formula depends only on , so both produce the same on the same ray from .
Concretely: the two branches of curve along the chord through at angle — the two intersection points of the chord-line with — yield identical auxiliary points . This is consistency check #2: pick a chord, build from each branch, and confirm they coincide.
Educational remark — why the harmonic mean appears
In a 1D problem along the axis, the lens equation reads , i.e. is half the harmonic mean of and . The angle enters because the chord is not along the axis: replaces , and similarly for . The factor appears as a uniform stretch on both sides of the equation, producing . Marking that distance along the chord is geometrically equivalent to projecting onto the axis a fixed offset of from — and projection onto a fixed direction is exactly what produces a straight line locus perpendicular to that direction.
What this also gives us — the focal length
The construction does not require , but once the line of ‘s is drawn, can be read off in two ways:
- for any one chord, where is now measurable as the angle between and the constructed axial direction .
- is the perpendicular distance from to the line of ‘s.
This was not asked, but it confirms that the curves contain enough information to fully determine the optical setup (lens circle, axis direction, focal length).
Sanity check — limiting case
In the limit (no lens, “imaging” is just a clear sightline), from above gives , and the image disappears. So finite was essential. Less trivially: as the lens circle shrinks, the two tangent lines from converge to a single line of sight to , and the image curve shrinks to a single point — the construction degenerates but remains consistent.
Summary of constructions
| Part | Object | Construction |
|---|---|---|
| (i) | The lens-centre circle | (a) Draw the two tangent rays from to curve and the two tangent rays from to curve . (b) Bisect the angle between the two rays at , and again at . (c) The centre of the lens circle is the intersection of the two bisectors; the radius is the perpendicular distance from to any of the four tangent rays. |
| (ii) | A line parallel to the lens plane | For three or more points on curve : locate on the line (using the lens circle from part (i)), and mark on segment at distance $\dfrac{ |
The reasoning behind each step:
- Part (i): lie on the same ray from , so the angular extent of curve at equals that of the lens circle, and their tangent rays from coincide. Two angle bisectors from external points pin the centre.
- Part (ii): The lens-equation rearrangement means that the harmonic-mean point on each chord lies at axial distance from , irrespective of . The locus is therefore a straight line perpendicular to the optical axis, which is parallel to the lens plane.