7. Water Hose 5 pts

Mechanics · Fluid dynamics, Dimensional analysis, Energy balance

Derive the Reynolds number from drag-force scaling, classify the flow in a garden hose, and compute how a nozzle changes the flow rate and the cleaning pressure.

High-level summary by Claude.

Ingredients Reynolds-number scalingdynamic-pressure frictionBernoulli stagnation pressurepump power balancecontinuity at a nozzle
Tags fluid-dynamicsreynolds-numberturbulent-flowlaminar-flowdimensional-analysisbernoullistagnation-pressurepipe-frictionnozzledynamic-pressurepump-powernumerical-cubic

Difficulty medium

Prerequisites

  • Continuity and Bernoulli for incompressible flow
  • Wall-stress versus pressure-drop relation in a pipe
  • Dimensional analysis of dynamic viscosity μ\mu (units Pas\text{Pa}\cdot\text{s})
  • Power = pressure rise × volumetric flow rate for a pump
  • Solving a cubic equation numerically (Newton iteration / bisection)

Learning objectives

  • Derive the Reynolds number R=ρvD/μR = \rho v D/\mu as the ratio of turbulent to laminar drag scales
  • Use the heuristic μv/δρv2\mu v/\delta \sim \rho v^2 to identify the boundary-layer thickness δD/R\delta \sim D/R
  • Apply Δpfv2\Delta p_f \propto v^2 for fully developed turbulent flow and calibrate the unknown coefficient from a single measured operating point
  • Write the pump energy balance P=Q[ρgh+Δpf+12ρvexit2]P = Q[\rho g h + \Delta p_f + \tfrac{1}{2}\rho v_\text{exit}^2] and identify which channel dominates
  • Recognise that adding a nozzle inflates the kinetic-energy term by 1/f21/f^2 and turns the balance into a cubic in α=Q1/Q0\alpha = Q_1/Q_0
  • Identify the excess pressure on a target wall as the Bernoulli stagnation pressure 12ρvjet2\tfrac{1}{2}\rho v_\text{jet}^2

Watch out for

  • The friction inside the hose is set by the hose mean speed vhv_h, not by the exit speed vexit=vh/fv_\text{exit} = v_h/f. Using vexitv_\text{exit} for friction over-estimates the friction loss by 1/f2441/f^2 \approx 44 and yields a much smaller flow rate.
  • The kinetic-energy term in the power balance uses the exit speed, not the hose speed. Forgetting that the nozzle accelerates the jet drops the leading new physics introduced by attaching the nozzle.
  • Treating Δpf\Delta p_f as if its prefactor were ρv2\rho v^2 on the nose (with no calibration) gives a friction loss roughly 300×300\times too large, because the order-of-magnitude estimate μv/δρv2\mu v/\delta \sim \rho v^2 does not fix the empirical numerical coefficient. Always calibrate from a measured operating point.
  • Assuming the nozzle leaves QQ unchanged and only inflates the exit pressure by 1/f21/f^2 misses the back-reaction: at fixed pump power the flow rate must drop. The correct answer for the pressure ratio is α2/f2\alpha^2/f^2, not 1/f21/f^2.
  • The excess pressure on the dirty surface is the stagnation pressure 12ρvjet2\tfrac{1}{2}\rho v_\text{jet}^2, not the static pressure inside the jet (which is atmospheric in a free jet) and not the dynamic pressure inside the hose.